ura_no_ura: (deadpan)
はたけ・カカシ 「HATAKE KAKASHI」 ([personal profile] ura_no_ura) wrote 2014-02-10 11:28 pm (UTC)

[ voice ]

Mmm, Shikamaru's mentioned a few concerns already, but we didn't exactly have the chance to talk at length, or as a group, until now. That's partly why I made this post -- not only to propose this idea, but to also invite dialogue.

As for whether or not a distinct alliance is a good idea, I personally think calling it an alliance, at least the military and emergency response part of it, makes quite a bit of sense. Especially for those of us with military backgrounds who answer to a leader. How we structure the leadership is something that can be discussed, but I don't see the harm in calling it an alliance, especially when it may concern the cooperation of larger parties with their own interests...

[ And here Kakashi pauses in consideration. ]

Is there some reason why you don't particularly like the word "alliance"? Or the idea of it?

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org